Health assessment system for rotating parts of locomotive running gear
-
摘要: 为推进机车走行部旋转部件实施状态修,在利用机车走行部在线监测系统采集的相关数据以及机车车辆走行部专家系统积累的故障诊断知识的基础上,建立机车走行部旋转部件健康评估系统,采用多维数据融合分析方法,完成机车走行部旋转部件健康状态评估,给出旋转部件健康评估结论和维修建议。该系统已在多个机务段投入应用,其适用性得到初步验证,能够提前发现旋转部件故障,输出合理的维修建议,有利于优化机车维修策略,为实现机车状态修奠定技术基础。Abstract: To promote the implementation of condition based maintenance for the rotating parts of locomotive running gear, a health assessment system for the rotating parts of locomotive running gear is established based on the relevant data collected by the online monitoring system of locomotive running gear and the fault diagnosis knowledge accumulated by the expert system of locomotive and vehicle running gear. The multi-dimensional data fusion analysis method is used to complete the health status assessment of the rotating parts of locomotive running gear, and provide health assessment conclusions and maintenance suggestions for the rotating parts. This system has been applied in multiple locomotive depots, and its applicability has been preliminarily verified. It can detect rotating part faults in advance and provide reasonable maintenance suggestions, which is conducive to optimizing locomotive maintenance strategies and laying a technical foundation for achieving locomotive condition maintenance.
-
表 1 轴承故障特征频谱计算公式
故障名称 故障特征频谱 保持架碰外环 $ {f}_{BW}=\dfrac{{D}_{0}-d{\mathrm{cos}}A}{2{D}_{0}}\cdot{f}_{n} $ 保持架碰内环 $ {f}_{BN}=\dfrac{{D}_{0}+d{\mathrm{cos}}A}{2{D}_{0}}\cdot{f}_{n} $ 外环故障 $ {f}_{W}=\dfrac{{D}_{0}-d{\mathrm{cos}}A}{2{D}_{0}}\cdot{Zf}_{n} $ 内环故障 $ {f}_{nei}=\dfrac{{D}_{0}+d{\mathrm{cos}}A}{2{D}_{0}}\cdot{Zf}_{n} $ 滚子单(端)故障 $ {f}_{d}=\dfrac{{D}_{0}^{2}-{d}^{2}{\mathrm{cos}}^{2}A}{2{D}_{0}*d}\cdot{f}_{n} $ 滚子双(周)故障 $ {f}_{d}=\dfrac{{D}_{0}^{2}-{d}^{2}{\mathrm{cos}}^{2}A}{{D}_{0}*d}\cdot{f}_{n} $ 表 2 机车走行部旋转部件健康等级与运用维修建议标准
序号 健康等级 运用维修建议 1 正常 状态正常 2 亚健康 状态参数部分偏离,注意关注 3 轻微故障 发现问题,根据严重程度进行视情检修 4 中等故障 5 严重故障 -
[1] 张卫华,李权福,宋冬利. 关于铁路机车车辆健康管理与状态修的思考[J]. 中国机械工程,2021,32(4):379-389. [2] 朱乾鎏,刘德昌,王 超. 和谐电力机车健康评估研究[J]. 技术与市场,2023,30(4):40-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8554.2023.04.011 [3] 李雪昆. 故障预测与健康管理技术在地铁列车上的应用[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2018,21(2):105-107. [4] 梁伟阁,张 钢,王 健,等. 复杂机械设备健康状态预测方法研究综述[J]. 兵器装备工程学报,2022,43(7):67-77. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2022.07.011 [5] 李权福,余祖俊,杨劲松. 基于PHM技术的重载货车状态修综合诊断模型研究[J]. 中国设备工程,2020(21):163-167. [6] 张 斌,宁友波,杨延峰,等. 铁路机车车辆车轮故障预测及健康管理技术研究及应用[J]. 铁道车辆,2021,59(6):45-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7602.2021.06.009 [7] 刘可安,戴计生,徐海龙. 城轨车辆关键部件状态修技术与系统解决方案[J]. 机车电传动,2020(4):1-7. [8] 贾萌珊,齐子元,薛德庆,等. 基于CSO-SVM的轴承健康状态评估研究[J]. 计算机测量与控制,2022,30(9):242-248,254. [9] Duan Y, Cao X G, Zhao J B, et al. Health indicator construction and status assessment of rotating machinery by spatio-temporal fusion of multi-domain mixed features[J]. Measurement, 2022, 205: 112170. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112170 [10] Zhang B Y, Miao Y H, Lin J, et al. Adaptive maximum second-order cyclostationarity blind deconvolution and its application for locomotive bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021, 158: 107736. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107736 [11] 中国铁路总公司. 机车车载安全防护系统(6A系统)机车走行部故障监测子系统-暂行技术条件:TJ/JW 001F-2018[S]. 北京:中国铁路总公司,2018.